The Slow Write

Judging by the “most read” stats for this website, a lot of people who reach this blog focus entirely on my essays regarding Ann Voskamp. In particular, people want to read my response to criticism of my first essay. Perhaps her beloved fans expect to see me on the back foot and penitent. In which case, they are no doubt surprised to find that my second essay was more adamant than the first.

I waited two years to reply to those criticisms posed by a junior reader. Two years. It was not that it took me that long to consider her words, but I wanted to reply in a way that was more considered than reactive.

Similarly, I have stopped posting regular long essays on this Culture Blog because things worth saying take time to prepare and to compose. They also take time to read and so belong in books.

Creedless Christianity Cover Volume One.jpg

I have been writing Creedless Christianity for four years next winter. It sounds a long time. But it is no time at all for the journey that it has been to write.

I began with a few idols, cherished by rather wishy-washy Christian publishers. I looked at the idols as people and corrected the myths surrounding them. Some English. Some American. As we move through the 19th century towards the 20th, the historical aspect deepens, for what we observed in the first idols has flourished in the later ones. We see the influence of one nation on another. Heresies that were tiny plants in a corner of England have now cast a shadow over a later generation - even over ourselves. Instead of looking at history for its own sake, we are understanding the mess in which we live and re-evaluating the many lies we have been told.

Just last week I was amazed at what the history books have not told us and I wonder how I will press so much research into my 18th chapter. But by God’s grace I will. Because this is not about writing for its own sake. This is not about publishing in the infantile worldly sense of pandering to an audience. This is about the truth. This is about understanding your history as a Christian: who you are, where you are and what you are supposed to do. I am not reinventing the wheel. Rather I am raising the flag of Protestantism, specifically Calvinism, which has been for too long pressed into the ground. It was not put there by the Johnny-cum-lately atheists or humanists, socialists or anarchists - but by Christians who argued against credal standards.

15 years ago, I would have given anything to have a book picked up by a Christian publisher. They brushed me away for all the wrong reasons and discouraged me for many years. But I am grateful. It took me 15 years, but I am grateful. Because if those publishers had accepted my juvenile efforts and patted me on the head, I would have produced light works for them for the rest of my life. But once you find yourself excluded from such a guild, you are free to think a little longer, a little wider, a little deeper. You do not have to look over your shoulder to please other people. You are not pressed into a box marked “encouraging women’s author” and told to make Christian people feel good about living in Sodom.

Those who have enjoyed being shocked by my analysis of Ann Voskamp had best avoid both volumes of Creedless Christianity. I hope, Lord willing to bring it to a conclusion this year or the next.

"Christian" Focus

On 2nd July 2020, I sent the following message to Christian Focus in response to their post:

Your blog post of 12th May 2020 is a disgrace. Florence Nightingale was vehemently and actively anti-Christian. Any research of her published writings makes that transparent. She tore up the Bible and was frequently blasphemous. Her family was highly dysfunctional so to reimagine them through the prism of a "Chalet School" style of writing is grossly inappropriate and layering myth upon myth. And to crown it all, she refused to believe that germs existed, so the idea of her enforcing scrupulous hygiene is laughable. Under her supervision, she had the hospital with the highest death rate of any in the Crimea. Whether you aim to celebrate her as a Christian or a nurse, a modicum of research would set you straight. You say that you would not consider publishing anything against the reformed faith. Very good, then I trust you will stop selling "Ten Girls Who Made History" and promoting this idol.

At the time of writing, no reply has been forthcoming.

Public Worship in England Today

The Christian act of public worship in the UK is now prohibited by law. 150 years after the disestablishment of the Church in Ireland, there is no longer an established Church in any part of the British Isles. Our forebears once died of plague in an effort to save the soul of sick people. But today the Churches are closed and ministers are reduced to joining the morass of voices on YouTube.

Read more

The Poison of Little Women

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=61598613

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=61598613

Having spent most of the summer researching Louisa May Alcott for a chapter in my ongoing project Creedless Christianity (and most of the autumn months writing it), the cinema release of yet another version of Little Women was a salutary reminder that I had not wasted my time. The influence of Alcott has not been measured adequately, nor to my knowledge judged.

The new film, like many modern films versions, is a twist on the original. Instead of Jo March being the heroine - the self-sacrificing, hard-working, dutiful Jo, all the publicity is centred on the character of Amy. She is the narcissist in the books, the self-absorbed and frivolous one - all modern virtues to be a heroine in the selfie generation.

Judging by interviews with the actress who plays Amy, the character has now become an ardent feminist, who can express the 20th century’s propaganda about the lot of women in the 19th century. It sounds even more dull and preaching than the original book, which Louisa May Alcott herself derided as “moral pap for the young”. Alcott’s was the 13th chapter I had written for Creedless Christianity and never before had I been forced to spend so long away from the subject to be submerged in the words of her puppet-masters. Louisa May Alcott surrendered her will, her mind and her soul at an early age to Ralph Waldo Emerson, her father Amos Bronson Alcott and writers such as Goethe and Thomas Carlyle. Her exhibitions of resentment against and dissatisfaction with Transcendentalism could not extract her from it. The poison was too deep in her bones. She would laugh at the Roman Catholic priest who offered to share the Gospel with her. She promoted Transcendentalist tenets by not rejecting them and by hating what her teachers hated. This is both implicit and explicit in Little Women. In a traditional film version of Little Women, Jo March is presented as the young woman struggling to break away from the strifling expectations of a society, which is regarded as “Christian”. It is not. It is the worst mongrel form of Transcendentalism. 

Transcendentalism is bald humanism. It denies that the Lord Jesus Christ is the Son of God and asserts the deity of Man. It says that we are not individuals: rather we are mere elements in the Ideal Man and the Ideal Woman. If we conform to agree with other people then we promote this unity. If we have a higher principle in seeking the glory of God (as every Christian should), then we thwart this aim and we become outcasts in society. This is cultural totalitarianism. He who defines the Ideal controls the minds of society. A new version of Little Women is just another opportunity to tell women how to conform to the Ideal Woman, defined for another generation.

This film will be presented as a feminist triumph over patriarchy. And anyone who thinks that was the aim of Alcott’s book is showing their ignorance. Louisa May Alcott knew the standard expected of her by Transcendentalism. She knew that she was supposed to be a submissive milk-sop, a wet-weekend, a frail and fragile lily in the New England pond. Louisa May Alcott’s character of Jo is a girl struggling to achieve this, struggling to become what she ought to be. She wants to be a “little woman”. This is a million miles from the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

I have set out to write seven more chapters before calling Creedless Christianity complete. It cannot be rushed, as each chapter is a small book in terms of research and scope. The previous release at the cinema to catch my eye was the Frozen sequel, based on Hans Christian Andersen. He is the subject of chapter 5 in Creedless Christianity. As Christmas approaches, I recall the difficulty I had dealing with Charles Dickens in chapter 7.

These people have cast very long shadows over our lives. Dickens, for instance, makes us adopt an artificial jollity at this time of year, a Pelagian fantasy that all the world is one big sugar lump of sweetness. One of my local “vicars” has pretty much said the same in her “Christmas message”:

So if for you Christmas is little more than just a good story, think again, because in the dust and dirt of human existence we all need the jewels; the acts of compassion, love and kindness, signs of hope and joy. Those images of new birth and re-creation are what keep us living our lives to the full.

Wrong. We need the Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God in Power, the Lord of All Creation, the Judge, the King.

I had the pleasure to read a very special book alongside my research into Louisa May Alcott. It was a true account written by a young woman in memorial of an invalid sister and the wonderful sister who had nursed her only to die a few years later in childbirth in the 1850s. We have the lives of three Christian women pressed into the pages like flowers from a long ago summer. They do not present an ideal woman - they show us how Christians in adversity live day to day by leaning on the Rock of their Salvation, how they find the strength to work, the courage to hope, the faith to trust, the love to endure - not because they possess any of these qualities in themselves but because they fill their cup daily from their Master’s hand and look to him for everything. Lord willing, I would like to reprint this delightful, encouraging and worthy book in the near future. To God be the glory.

Dead Saviours

While so much in British politics is on hold to avoid leaving Europe, the government are proceeding with plans to make all bodies the possession of the State. In a short time, we will be presumed to be organ donors unless we take the trouble to opt-out:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-45056780

This has been the law in Wales for the last 3 years, so that those of us visiting Wales for the day have been in an ambiguous position: if there was a terrible road accident, would they check whether we were resident in Wales before taking our organs or after?

Read more

Composing when not under the influence

I read this article the other day by Katie Botkin:

https://medium.com/@katherineheline/why-the-devil-gets-all-the-good-music-dbe4335e7098

It purports to be looking at the deficiencies of Christian art, specifically music. She makes some obvious points, which tend to throw more rocks at a form of American Christianity than illuminate the matter of music with any depth.

Her main point is that Christians make poor art because they will only project a censored view of life, which lacks any authenticity with respect to the “human experience”, is cold and therefore bad art. She bases this on her own attempts to conform to this artificial and culturally-influenced standard in novel writing. She contrasts this with her brother’s song-writing which invokes more Buddhism than Christianity and is better art because it is “real”.

Read more

How does your garden grow?

This hedge of conifers is 85 foot long and has been growing alongside my home for over 25 years.

On Monday, it will be felled.

The action is not voluntary. We are being compelled by the Council, who assert that the pavement is being obstructed. Although the conifers at either end grow out more than in the middle, it is not so obstructed that neighbours do not cycle down the path at speed. Two ladies walked arm in arm down the pavement the other day. Besides, no neighbour complained to us. We knew nothing until we were given an ultimatum.

Read more

No time left for sentiment

When Christianity is reduced to sentimentality, the Church neglects its duty to God. Surrendering to the world, apologising for what it believes, desperate to prove itself “kind”, the Church soon falls into decay.

Some will say that such an approach is merely love for our enemies. But consider what “love” means. It is seeking someone’s good in accordance with God’s laws. Therefore, if someone is promoting heresy and leading others on the road to perdition, we would seek their good by pointing out their errors, rather than allowing them to lead others into sin. So if we would love our enemies we will be busy and unpopular.

Read more

Excerpts from "No Earthly Good?" by Abigail J. Fox

“Culture follows religion. We cannot mend the religion of others. We can only take care of our own. Once we understand our duties, we may provide an edifying influence on the Christians around us. Should this be true and growing, then such a Church will be a beautiful sight and will produce its own culture, a vineyard worth sampling. That culture could be replicated whenever God-fearing people populate a Christian Church. And should those people find themselves with authority over regions and even a nation, then the culture will reflect the religion by God’s appointment, and not by the shortcut taken by well-meaning but arrogant Christians.

Read more

Idols and the perversion of Florence Nightingale

For over two years I have been researching and writing for a book about idols who are accepted as Christian (or accepted by Christians). The adoration of such idols makes them millstones around our neck. We are encouraged to act in imitation of them, to construe their behaviour as Christian, even though on closer inspection they disregarded most of God’s commands and set themselves up as saviours of mankind. By worshipping such men and women, we lead others into idolatry and far from their duty before God.

Read more

Give us this day our daily bread

These words from the Lord’s Prayer have gained a special poignancy to me over the last year. As commercially produced bread is increasingly adulterated with soya flour (often modified), it has been more and more difficult to find any wholesome options to buy. I started to make it myself, as a supplement to the bread available, but over the Christmas holiday we have only had the bread I have made.

I remember one of my favourite Sunday books as a very little child was called “Thank you for my loaf of bread”. The little boy thanks his parents, who say that they only bought it; he thanks the baker who only baked it; he thanks the farmer … and so on, until he thanks the Lord for his loaf of bread. The attitude of gratitude is certainly the right one.

Read more

The Alignment of Romanticism and Roman Catholicism

England apostatised through Romanticism. It was a suitable portal because it did not appear to be a religion. Most people did not even know the term - they just became obsessively interested in literature, art, music and architecture. Once their interest was captured, the English became very jealous over their right to enjoy the Arts. Ultimately, in 1870, they fought the clergy over the right of the people to have a concert in a cathedral rather than a sermon. The people won and there was no turning back.

Read more

Why do we sing?

When we sing (rather than read) the Psalms, we hear the words differently. We proclaim rather than study and, unless we are dreadful hypocrites, the act of singing Psalms is a declaration of consent. There may be parts of the Psalms we do not understand as well as others and that should provoke us to further study, but it is still important to sing them all. We are not told only to sing the Psalms once we have reached a level of theological acumen. By contrast, the person who sings the hymns of men selects those which he feels to be most true, which accurately reflect his beliefs and experience. We are not given such autonomy with the Psalms. We sing the same songs as children, adults and in old age. We change - the Psalms do not.

Read more

Answering Criticisms of my Review of Ann Voskamp's "One Thousand Gifts"

In December 2016, I received a lengthy comment on my review of “One Thousand Gifts” by Ann Voskamp. I chose not to publish the comment at that time because to do so would have required a response. I was not sure how to approach the commenter and therefore put it aside. But I never forgot the comment's opening words:

Firstly, it's not a book of theology. 

My original review was written nearly 4 years ago and in that time I have given little thought to Ann Voskamp and her large number of followers. This week I revisited her website to see how things had changed. Less than one week ago and to coincide with Easter, she had published an excerpt from her new book. It started thus:

Read more

Review of “Sister Aimee: The Life of Aimee Semple McPherson” by Daniel Mark Epstein

A biography of such an unusual person was never going to be a straightforward task and Daniel Mark Epstein successfully portrays her life.

We begin with Aimee Kennedy and rehearse the stories that she herself told about her childhood. We observe the transformation first to Aimee Semple, the wife of a Pentecostal missionary; then to Aimee Semple McPherson, the housewife who will not be tied down and leaves her husband to embark on her own evangelistic tours. Between the large-scale events at Angelus Temple, we examine her mysterious disappearance, the breakdown of the relationship with her mother, her daughter’s divorce, Aimee’s short-lived third marriage, the law suit with her daughter until the rather sudden ending - she took too many sleeping pills and never woke up.

Read more

The Romantic: Someone who looks for spiritual truth in material things

Since most people are unaware of their own “Romantic” attitudes, the following definitions have been prepared to bring home the practical outworking of Romanticism in our lives today. Anyone who would like to understand the origins of Romanticism should read Tim Blanning’s rather uncritical work, The Romantic Revolution. In Music Mania I demonstrate how music became the exclusive domain of the Romantic movement.

This philosophy appears to be innocent and inoffensive but over time it perverts our perception of truth and destroys our ability to find truth outside of material things. For the Christian this engenders a change from living by faith through the Word of God, to trusting the Art of Man and therefore living by the senses.

If you had once walked in Christendom as “someone who expects to find spiritual truth in material things” you would have been deemed an idolater. After all, what does the idolater do that the Romantic does not? Either you make art or you purchase it from someone else, with the goal of gaining spiritual enlightenment outside of God’s appointed means. 

Not everyone will demonstrate every aspect here defined because people are never consistent. However, Romanticism is often stronger in women than in men, giving rise to a dislocation between the sexes that was unknown before the Enlightenment. Then the difference between the sexes was one of roles in the world - now we have communication problems based on a woman’s desire to live in a Romanticised bubble and a man’s inability to make it happen.

In broader terms, Romanticism encourages people to live selfishly and diminishes their capacity to judge other people’s needs. (The Romantic person will be moved by a television appeal for famine relief in Africa but will be unable to see the mum struggling to afford the weekly shop at the next checkout.) Therefore it has dulled our characters and left us as wraiths. We are sometimes awoken to reality by the magnitude of problems we cannot avoid (sickness, death, tragedy) and it is at such times that we realise the inadequacy of the Romanticised mind. If we cannot find a way to feel good, then who are we and what is left of our lives? Therefore Romanticism is nothing more than well-dressed Humanism, ivy climbing around the tree of our faith, to sap our hope in Christ and make us glad of the ivy’s supportive embrace. 

Life and Death: A Children's Guide

There are times when we are happy and there are times when we are sad. We don’t mind happiness. We don’t stop and worry what it means or whether it will end - we are simply happy. But it is different when we are sad: we want it to stop hurting; we want to feel better. But there is no magic wand. Some people drink too much and take drugs to stop themselves knowing they are sad. But they still feel sad next morning.

Read more

Feel Good Christianity


In late 17th century Scotland, a young farmer waits to meet his fiancée. She is a maid in the nearby hall. Today she is late, so the young man takes out his Bible and leans against a wall to read.

A party of soldiers crosses the bridge, leading to the farm. They are paid by the Crown to hunt down Covenanters. Right now they are searching for the two sons of this farm. Their eyes land on the young farmhand. He looks about the right age to be one of the sons. And what is that in his hand? No one but a Covenanter would read a Bible! The soldiers approach the young man and shoot him dead.

Read more

Music Saves No One

The evening news closed with the obituary of "Holocaust-survivor" Alice Herz-Sommer, whose story features in a short film, soon to be noticed in the Oscars. The Lady in Number 6 provided clips of the deceased pianist, suitable for an evening news bulletin. In one of these excerpts, Mrs. Herz-Sommer said that music is her religion before correcting herself - music is her god.

If this lady had not been through World War II, we would gasp at such a sentiment. But we do not gasp. We are asked instead to admire her courage, optimism and humanity. The fact that she managed to survive through music and by music is deemed a victory.

Read more